The suicide hypothesis of the 31-year-old mother found in the Piave river is excluded. the woman, Anica Panphile, was disappearance in the void and then found dead on the afternoon of May 21, in the province of Treviso. Circumstances had suggested a extreme gesturebut the results ofautopsy leave no doubt: it was a homicide. The hypothesis examined by the researchers is that of a degenerate fight in the assassination
Anica Panfile, mother of 4 childrenon May 18, he had left his workplace around 2 in the afternoon I had not come homewhere he lived with his partner, in a council house in the Municipality of spresian.
The woman had been in Arcade to pick up the Cud from her former employer, Franco Battaggia, owner of a fish shop where Panfile she worked as a cookas reported by the Tribuna di Treviso.
The colleague had immediately filed a complaint, concerned about his absence.
On Sunday May 21, a fisherman had found her body in the Piave river. According to the first external examination, there were no signs of violence on the body.
For this reason, at first, the hypothesis that it could have been suicide.
The results of the autopsy
The autopsy, however, reversed the scenario. In fact, the typical signs of a He drowned: in the lungs of women no water foundwhile there are numerous face and head injuries.
The body does not present then some compatible fractures with a fall from above Panfile would have been then taken to the river Already deadafter being killed perhaps with a series of headshots.
The prosecutor has opened a file for homicide in charge of strangers, waiting to reconstruct the last hours of the woman’s life and put a face to the culprit of her death.
Anyone who had contact with Anica Panfile before her death will be heard and analyzed in the coming days. camera images surveillance to reconstruct the movements of the last hours.
A witness would have seen her around 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 18, near the old place of work. Is about the last testimony de Anica is still alive.
of the woman the cell phone is not foundthat could be crucial to clarify the facts.
The dispute hypothesis
According to the Tribuna di Treviso, a hypothesis that is making its way among researchers is that of homicide after a fight.
Maybe someone who knew her though not having planned the murderduring an argument he may have killed her in a hurry.
The blows to the face and neck were reportedly inflicted violently with a blunt object, maybe a stick or crowbarthat the killer could have grabbed in a moment of anger, at the height of a fight.
After killing her, he hid the body Investigators would also be investigating the presence of another personwhat can you have helped the murderer to carry the body to the river.
The killer could have approached the Piave by car as close as possible and then by hand, with the help of another person, would have thrown it into the water.
Leave a Reply